Solenoid valve reliability in lower energy operations

If a valve doesn’t operate, your process doesn’t run, and that’s cash down the drain. Or worse, a spurious trip shuts the method down. Or worst of all, a valve malfunction results in a harmful failure. Solenoid valves in oil and gasoline functions control the actuators that move giant process valves, including in emergency shutdown (ESD) systems. The solenoid must exhaust air to allow the ESD valve to return to fail-safe mode whenever sensors detect a dangerous course of situation. These valves should be quick-acting, durable and, above all, reliable to forestall downtime and the related losses that occur when a course of isn’t working.
And this is even more essential for oil and fuel operations where there is limited energy obtainable, corresponding to remote wellheads or satellite offshore platforms. Here, solenoids face a double reliability problem. First, a failure to function correctly can’t only cause pricey downtime, but a maintenance call to a remote location additionally takes longer and costs greater than an area repair. Second, to minimize back เกจวัดแรงดันอากาศ for energy, many valve producers resort to compromises that truly reduce reliability. This is unhealthy sufficient for process valves, however for emergency shutoff valves and different safety instrumented methods (SIS), it’s unacceptable.
Poppet valves are generally higher suited than spool valves for distant areas as a end result of they’re much less complicated. For low-power purposes, search for a solenoid valve with an FFR of 10 and a design that isolates the media from the coil. (Courtesy of Norgren Inc.)
Choosing a dependable low-power solenoid
Many elements can hinder the reliability and efficiency of a solenoid valve. Friction, media move, sticking of the spool, magnetic forces, remanence of electrical present and materials characteristics are all forces solenoid valve producers have to beat to construct the most dependable valve.
High spring force is essential to offsetting these forces and the friction they trigger. However, in low-power purposes, most manufacturers should compromise spring force to allow the valve to shift with minimal power. The reduction in spring force results in a force-to-friction ratio (FFR) as low as 6, although the generally accepted security degree is an FFR of 10.
Several components of valve design play into the amount of friction generated. Optimizing every of those allows a valve to have greater spring pressure while nonetheless sustaining a excessive FFR.
For instance, the valve operates by electromagnetism — a present stimulates the valve to open, allowing the media to flow to the actuator and transfer the process valve. This media could also be air, but it may also be pure gas, instrument fuel and even liquid. This is especially true in distant operations that should use whatever media is out there. This means there’s a trade-off between magnetism and corrosion. Valves in which the media is available in contact with the coil have to be made from anticorrosive materials, which have poor magnetic properties. A valve design that isolates the media from the coil — a dry armature — permits the use of extremely magnetized materials. As a outcome, there isn’t a residual magnetism after the coil is de-energized, which in flip allows quicker response times. This design also protects reliability by stopping contaminants within the media from reaching the inside workings of the valve.
Another issue is the valve housing design. Usually a heavy (high-force) spring requires a high-power coil to beat the spring power. Integrating the valve and coil into a single housing improves efficiency by preventing vitality loss, permitting for the use of a low-power coil, leading to much less energy consumption with out diminishing FFR. This built-in coil and housing design also reduces heat, preventing spurious trips or coil burnouts. A dense, thermally efficient (low-heat generating) coil in a housing that acts as a heat sink, designed with no air hole to lure heat across the coil, virtually eliminates coil burnout considerations and protects course of availability and security.
Poppet valves are typically better suited than spool valves for distant operations. The lowered complexity of poppet valves will increase reliability by reducing sticking or friction factors, and decreases the variety of parts that can fail. Spool valves often have large dynamic seals and plenty of require lubricating grease. Over time, especially if the valves are not cycled, the seals stick and the grease hardens, resulting in higher friction that should be overcome. There have been stories of valve failure as a result of moisture in the instrument media, which thickens the grease.
A direct-acting valve is your finest option wherever potential in low-power environments. Not solely is the design much less advanced than an indirect-acting piloted valve, but in addition pilot mechanisms usually have vent ports that can admit moisture and contamination, leading to corrosion and allowing the valve to stick within the open place even when de-energized. Also, direct-acting solenoids are particularly designed to shift the valves with zero minimum stress necessities.
Note that some larger actuators require excessive circulate charges and so a pilot operation is necessary. In this case, it is important to confirm that every one parts are rated to the same reliability ranking as the solenoid.
Finally, since most remote locations are by definition harsh environments, a solenoid put in there must have sturdy construction and have the power to stand up to and function at extreme temperatures while nonetheless sustaining the identical reliability and security capabilities required in much less harsh environments.
When selecting a solenoid management valve for a remote operation, it’s attainable to find a valve that does not compromise performance and reliability to scale back energy calls for. Look for a excessive FFR, simple dry armature design, great magnetic and warmth conductivity properties and strong development.
Andrew Barko is the sales engineer for the Energy Sector of IMI Precision Engineering, makers of IMI Norgren, IMI Maxseal and IMI Herion model components for power operations. He provides cross-functional experience in utility engineering and business development to the oil, gasoline, petrochemical and energy industries and is licensed as a pneumatic Specialist by the International Fluid Power Society (IFPS).
Collin Skufca is the necessary thing account manager for the Energy Sector for IMI Precision Engineering. He offers expertise in new enterprise growth and customer relationship management to the oil, gasoline, petrochemical and energy industries and is licensed as a pneumatic specialist by the International Fluid Power Society (IFPS).

Leave a Comment